VENOM:
A “VENOMOUS” LETDOWN!
By Nico
Beland
Movie
Review: ** out of 4
COLUMBIA
PICTURES AND MARVEL
Tom
Hardy is Venom
Tom Hardy (The Dark Knight Rises, Mad
Max: Fury Road, Dunkirk) gets an
alien symbiote attached to him and transforms into the powerful Venom in his
first movie, directed by Ruben Fleischer (Zombieland,
30 Minutes or Less, Gangster Squad) and based on the beloved
Marvel Comics character. This isn’t
the first time Venom appeared in a live-action movie as the character originally
made his cinematic debut in 2007’s Spider-Man
3 and was portrayed by Topher Grace.
Ever since Spider-Man 3’s release, plans for a Venom movie were already announced and the film went through
development hell. There were talks of including the character in the 2012 Amazing Spider-Man universe, but that
idea was thrown out the window after The
Amazing Spider-Man 2 underperformed in 2014, and Venom appearing in the Marvel Cinematic Universe after the
critical and commercial success of 2017’s Spider-Man:
Homecoming was considered.
After the collaboration with Marvel on Spider-Man: Homecoming which earned praise from critics, audiences,
and fans alike and box-office profits Sony
decides to…not reteam with Marvel on
this Venom film and go back to their
usual shtick. Well, okay then, at least that means we get a hardcore Venom movie that has a body count and a
hard R rating, right? Nope, PG-13 because we “might” want to include
it in the MCU or maybe we don’t, and
we got to get those kids in the movie theaters.
That’s one of the lousiest reasons
to tone down a movie’s rating in my opinion, if the Deadpool movies and Logan
are R-rated and part of the X-Men franchise, why couldn’t this earn
the same rating and part of the MCU?
After all the Daredevil, Jessica Jones, and Luke Cage Netflix shows
are pretty heavy but they still take place in the same universe as the Avengers.
I was still open to the movie and
whether it’s good or bad it’s at least sure to have a better understanding of
the character than Spider-Man 3. In
terms of the character, it’s definitely an improvement over Topher Grace’s
awkward performance in Spider-Man 3,
but as a movie, it’s an inconsistent mess.
Unpopular opinion here, I don’t hate
this movie, it has some legitimately cool and exciting moments and Tom Hardy is
giving it his all. But the movie’s not sure what it’s trying to be, is it
trying to be a darker and more mature alternative to the traditional superhero
movie genre or is it trying to get the kids into the theater, so the studio can
sell toys? It needs to be one or the other because if you try to meet in the
middle it becomes unfocused and uninteresting.
When an alien symbiote crash lands
on Earth, journalist Eddie Brock (Hardy) accidentally becomes the host of the
symbiote, while attempting to investigate a scandal regarding a mysterious organization
and is given a violent alter-ego known as Venom. However, the organization known
as the Life Foundation and its CEO, Carlton Drake (Riz Ahmed-Nightcrawler, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, The
Night Of), who has discovered three more symbiotes and becomes obsessed
with trying to bond them with humans to prepare mankind for the end of the
world, is out to get Eddie and extract the missing symbiote.
Eddie must use his new powers to
stop this shadowy organization and save the world from extinction. Oh, and
cause some property damage and manslaughter while he’s at it.
The film also stars Michelle
Williams (Blue Valentine, Shutter Island, Manchester by the Sea) as Anne Weying, Scott Haze (Child of God, Midnight Special, Only the
Brave) as Roland Treece, Reid Scott (It’s
All Relative, My Boys, Veep) as Dr. Dan Lewis, Jenny Slate (Saturday Night Live, Zootopia, The Secret Life of Pets) as Dr. Dora Skirth, and Michelle Lee (Trailer Park of Terror, Resident Evil 6 (video game), Mortal Kombat: Legacy) as Donna Diego.
Overall, Venom manages to do the character both justice and injustice at the
same time, unlike in Spider-Man 3 he
isn’t thrown in at the last minute with little screen-time and there are plenty
of stand-out moments with Venom kicking ass. But as cool as the Venom scenes
are, they’re ruined by the studio playing it safe and gore-free to get a wider
audience and a script that could use a rewrite.
I’m aware the original Venom comics
are intended for teen readers, which kind of warmed me up to the film’s PG-13 rating. But when you see him smashing,
slicing, and eating people on-screen and there’s no gore, it doesn’t feel as
impactful and just makes you wish the movie went full force with an R rating, or at the very least an uncut
version for home media.
Even if the movie went into hard R territory, it wouldn’t excuse its
script which in terms of plot is another generic superhero movie origin story.
But then you have scenes with Tom Hardy eating food out of the garbage, unnecessary
overacting, and delivering some really corny dialogue, as well as the one
F-bomb allowed in a PG-13 movie.
With all that said, there are some
things worth praising with Venom, Tom Hardy nails the performance of Eddie
Brock/Venom and succeeds where Topher Grace failed in Spider-Man 3. Venom in Spider-Man
3 was a straight-up villain but there wasn’t enough time devoted to
him and he was killed off pretty fast, whereas here, he’s closer to the comics as
an anti-hero and takes a Jekyll and Hyde
approach similar to The Mask the more
I think about it, but if Venom started throwing Mr. Hyde’s Psycho-Wave that
would have been my cue to walk out.
I got a kick out of the scenes where
Hardy was talking to the Venom symbiote but nobody else could hear him. They
both have really funny lines and it’s a clever way to give Venom a personality.
Had this movie picked a tone and was
given a better script, Venom could
have been great, but as is it’s just a confused waste of potential. It isn’t
one of the worst comic book movies I’ve ever seen, it’s just uneventful, but at
least we got a trailer for Spider-Man:
Into the Spider-Verse during the credits, I guess that counts as something.
No comments:
Post a Comment