Thursday, August 7, 2025

Freakier Friday review

 Coming Soon! 

Weapons review

 Coming Soon! 

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Together review

TOGETHER: 

DAVE FRANCO AND ALISON BRIE BODY-HORROR FILM BRINGS PEOPLE TOGETHER…IN THE MOST HORRIFIC WAYS IMAGINABLE! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: **** out of 4


NEON

Dave Franco and Alison Brie in Together

 

            Dave Franco (21 Jump StreetNow You See Me trilogy, The Disaster Artist) and Alison Brie (Community,Scream 4The Lego Movie 1 and 2) get closer together (literally) in Together, the new horror film from Neon and Michael Shanks in his feature film directorial debut. The movie looked fascinating when I saw the trailer especially for someone who’s had a fair share of experience with the bizarre works of filmmakers like David Cronenberg. 

            This definitely seemed like it was going to be in the same boat as many of Cronenberg’s projects or other body-horror like last year’s The Substance. I also figured that before I talk about the new horror movie from the Barbariandirector that just came out, I should give my thoughts on this first and what’s my verdict? It’s fucking great, but holy shit! 

            Together easily takes the cake for the craziest movie I’ve seen all year and this was a year that had demonic monkey toys, Michael B. Jordan fighting vampires, and Robert Pattinson clones and giant worm aliens. It is not for everyone, just warning you now and I strongly recommend watching the trailers to determine whether or not it’s for you (The people behind me in the theater were not happy with it). 

            The film follows Tim (Franco) and Millie Wilson (Brie), a couple who move to the countryside where Millie gets a job teaching at an elementary school while Tim works to pursue his aspiring musician career. But when they find themselves in a cave during a hike in the woods, they encounter a mysterious force that causes changes in their bodies…and by that I mean, they start sticking to each other! 

            The film also stars Damon Herriman (Once Upon a Time in HollywoodThe BikeridersBetter Man) as Jamie. 

            Overall, Together is unhinged body-horror insanity at its finest while also having a sick sense of humor about the whole thing. I was invested, laughing, and horrified at very sporadic intervals all throughout the film, everything you’d want to feel while watching a movie like this. 

It definitely owes a lot to David Cronenberg and H.P. Lovecraft in terms of the filmmaking and storytelling. Cronenberg for the amounts of body-horror and grotesque makeup effects that look incredible, by the way and Lovecraft for its ritualistic themes and the cave itself often having a monstrous appearance like Cthulhu and the designs of the conjoined people/animals being reminiscent of monsters from Lovecraftian stories. 

The movie also does have some elements of John Carpenter particularly his version of The Thing with a genuinely spine-tingling opening sequence involving a couple of dogs. Despite the comparisons to these other works, there is enough here to make the film feel fresh and new, the premise alone is something you don’t see in movies that much unless it’s from a studio like Neon or A24.

There is a genuinely frightening and brilliantly-executed sequence involving hair that’s one of many big highlights of the film, but what’s so clever about Shanks’ filmmaking is that he keeps many of these freaky moments a mystery and often cut right to the next day without much of a segway. It keeps the pace going and leaves things to the audience’s imagination which I appreciate, not everything needs to be spelled out for the audience. 

Real-life couple, Dave Franco and Alison Brie are excellent in the movie and add a lot of emotional weight to an otherwise chaotic movie. Yeah, they aren’t the most deep or complex protagonists but I cared about them and wanted to see them prevail by the end with Brie I think being a huge standout as a woman nearly at her breaking point. 

Some minor nitpicks I had with the movie were I was able to quickly figure out who was going to be involved with the situation that’s happening to Franco and Brie’s characters and what it was all amounting to, it didn’t ruin the movie for me at all, but you can easily see who the suspicious character is going to be by the end. I’m also torn on how the film ended which I’d rather not discuss here, but maybe upon rewatches or watching YouTube videos that discuss the ending, I’ll be able to understand and appreciate it more. 

Yeah, Together was a blast in the most unexpected of ways, if you’re a fan of movies like Crimes of the Futureor The Substance that you absolutely need to check this out. It is body-horror chaos filled with grotesque yet amazing effects, a sick sense of humor, and solid performances by Franco and Brie, it’s a phenomenal start to a prominent future for Michael Shanks. 

The Naked Gun review

THE NAKED GUN: 

LIAM NEESON BRINGS THE LAUGHS IN UPROARIOUSLY FUNNY LEGACY SEQUEL! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: *** ½ out of 4


PARAMOUNT PICTURES

Liam Neeson in The Naked Gun (2025)

 

            Liam Neeson (Schindler’s ListBatman BeginsTaken trilogy) takes on the mantle from late comedy legend, Leslie Nielsen as police Lieutenant Frank Drebin (The new version) in the legacy sequel to The Naked Gun, the fourth film in the Naked Gun franchise which spawned from the TV series, Police Squad. I rewatched the original three Naked Gun movies from 1988-1994 in preparation for this review and I have to say the original Naked Gun film starring Leslie Nielsen earns its place as a comedy classic as it is just as funny in 2025 as it was in 1988 with jokes constantly thrown left and right and taking different forms whether it’s witty dialogue, visual gags, well-timed slapstick, or simply the wise decision of Leslie Nielsen playing his part completely straight thus making said moments infinitely funnier than if he was mugging to the camera and acting like an idiot throughout the films. 

            Easily some of the Zucker Brothers’ best work and sits right up there with comedies like Airplane! and Top Secret!. Now we have this legacy sequel produced by Seth MacFarlane (Family GuyAmerican DadTed franchise) and directed by The Lonely Island’s Akiva Schaffer (Hot RodPopstar: Never Stop Never StoppingChip ‘n Dale: Rescue Rangers) with Neeson as Frank Drebin Jr., the son of Leslie Nielsen’s character from the original three films.

            I was interested when the film was announced though I was initially taking a backseat when it was confirmed that Liam Neeson who was mostly known for action and dramatic performances was playing the lead. Then the trailers started to win me over as I thought it looked genuinely funny albeit in a dumb, goofy way which isn’t a strike against it at all. 

            Whether this movie is funny because it’s dumb, smart, or a bit of both, what matters is the laugh-factor and The Naked Gun (2025) is…one of the funniest movies I’ve seen all year, hands down! I guess Friendship and the recent Looney Tunes movie are technically better made comedies, but this film kept the laughs coming a mile a minute all throughout the runtime and this is a movie I strongly urge people to go see in a theater with a crowd for the absolute best experience. 

            The film follows Lieutenant Frank Drebin Jr. (Neeson), a man with a very particular set of skills, skills that make him a nightmare for people like…wait, wrong movie! The son of Frank Drebin who must succeed in his father’s footsteps to prevent Police Squad from closing by cracking a high-stakes case surrounding tech mogul, Richard Cane (Danny Huston-X-Men Origins: WolverineBig EyesWonder Woman) who has a very sinister plot involving a literal P.L.O.T. Device unless Drebin can stop him in time and save the day. 

            The film also stars Pamela Anderson (BaywatchScooby-DooThe Last Showgirl) as Beth Davenport, Paul Walter Hauser (Black BirdRichard JewellThe Fantastic Four: First Steps) as Capt. Ed Hocken Jr., CCH Pounder (The ShieldAvatarDC Animated Universe) as Chief Davis, Kevin Durand (Dark AngelLostKingdom of the Planet of the Apes) as Sig Gustafson, and Liza Koshy (Transformers: Rise of the BeastsGood Burger 2KPop Demon Hunters) as Detective Barnes. 

            Overall, The Naked Gun (2025) is a long overdue return to comedies that are funny just for the sake of being funny without trying to go beyond that. This movie made me think back to those early Zucker Brothers or Mel Brooks comedies and even films like Shrek 2 and the Lord/Miller Jump Street movies that constantly throw joke after joke after joke and the majority of them hit bullseye. 

            I was sold just on the opening sequence which was shown in the trailers where Liam Neeson disguises himself as a little girl complete with a Mission: Impossible-style mask to thwart a bank robbery and seeing him take this criminals out in the most ridiculous ways imaginable made me laugh hard almost to the point of tears. There’s also a great running joke involving coffee that’s probably my favorite bit in the entire film every time it appears. 

            But what actually makes this movie funny is Liam Neeson himself as like Leslie Nielsen in the original films, he is playing this character 100% straight. Neeson’s version of Drebin is essentially his Taken character…if he just happened to walk into a comedy with him talking and acting like a badass yet he ends up doing goofy and outlandish things. 

            There’s also a nice albeit comedic tribute to Leslie Nielsen early on in the movie with Neeson and other police officers looking at a wall of deceased officers and one of them shows a picture of Nielsen as Drebin followed by a jab at O.J. Simpson. Even when The Naked Gun respects the dead, they’re still cracking jokes about them. 

            Despite thoroughly enjoying this movie, I don’t think it’s a perfect movie (Then again, I wasn’t really going in expecting that) and that’s because while Neeson and Pamela Anderson portray their roles well (Particularly the former), I personally think their romantic chemistry was as strong or well-developed as Leslie Nielsen and Priscilla Presley from the earlier films. Yes, it’s still a very humorous relationship and not meant to be taken seriously, but I felt there was more time devoted to Nielsen and Presley than there was Neeson and Anderson here, maybe I’m just nitpicking. 

            Yeah, this new Naked Gun surpassed my expectations and delivers a hysterical, non-stop gag-packed ride with one of Liam Neeson’s best roles in a while. This is also the best Seth MacFarlane-related project since that Ted series on Peacock, I haven’t seen much new Family Guy or American Dad so I can’t comment on that, but this is some of the funniest MacFarlane material in quite some time for me. 

            In an age where Hollywood comedies struggle and are often dumped on streaming graveyards, The Naked Gun(2025) stands among the rest as a true big screen comedy in the best ways. Paramount, Schaffer, MacFarlane, and Neeson did good on this one so please go see it…also, Weird Al is in the movie! 

The Bad Guys 2 review

THE BAD GUYS 2: 

BAD GUYS GONE GOOD RETURN IN SUPER-FUN, SUPER-BAD SECOND HEIST! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: *** ½ out of 4


UNIVERSAL PICTURES AND DREAMWORKS ANIMATION

Piranha, Tarantula, Shark, Wolf, and “The Bad Girls” in The Bad Guys 2

 

            Everyone’s favorite anthropomorphic ex-cons are back in The Bad Guys 2, the latest film from DreamWorks Animation and follow-up to their 2022 animated hit, The Bad Guys based on the graphic novel series of the same name by Aaron Blabey. Having not read the original comics, I thoroughly enjoyed the first Bad Guys and found it to be a very funny and clever homage to heist films (Particularly the works of Steven Soderbergh like the Ocean’s trilogy) with tons of nods and references to the genre sprinkled throughout. 

            Sure, it isn’t a cinematic game-changer like Shrek or an emotional rollercoaster like the Kung Fu Panda and How to Train Your Dragon films, it’s just a really funny comedy and despite being aimed at kids, the film works tremendously well as a heist movie. On top of that, a gorgeous visual style reminiscent of a stylized graphic novel which is very fitting given the source material. 

            Entertaining movie and one of two wins for DreamWorks that year (The other being Puss in Boots: The Last Wish) so, now we have a sequel with the original voice cast returning and Pierre Perifel (Bilby) back in the director’s chair. I was onboard for a second Bad Guys film though I wasn’t exactly hyped for it or anything, it seemed like another fun homage to heist movies with the Bad Guys (Now “Good”) tricking a new group of criminals into sabotaging a heist after enlisting their help. 

            Yeah, The Bad Guys 2 gave me exactly what I was expecting which isn’t a bad thing at all. I found this movie consistently hilarious and like the first, it’s a well-executed heist film though I personally felt the first had a much tighter storyline where this one goes into space (Literally). Granted, I take the Bad Guys going into space more seriously than Dominic Toretto and his crew in F9, but I digress. 

            The film follows reformed ex-cons, Mr. Wolf (voiced by Sam Rockwell-The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the GalaxyMoonMarvel Cinematic Universe), Mr. Snake (voiced by Marc Maron-Mike and Dave Need Wedding DatesDC League of Super-PetsSpringsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere), Mr. Shark (voiced by Craig Robinson-The OfficeHot Tub Time Machine 1 and 2This is the End), Mr. Piranha (voiced by Anthony Ramos-In the HeightsTransformers: Rise of the BeastsTwisters), and Ms. Tarantula (voiced by Awkwafina-Crazy Rich AsiansThe FarewellRaya and the Last Dragon) struggling to fit into society given their checkered pasts. But after a series of crimes result in the Bad Guys being framed and the city turning against them, they soon find themselves hijacked into a high-stakes, globe-trotting heist masterminded by a new group of criminals, The Bad Girls, Kitty Kat (voiced by Danielle Brooks-Orange Is the New BlackThe Color Purple (2023), A Minecraft Movie), Doom (voiced by Natasha Lyonne-Orange Is the New BlackSmurfs (2025), The Fantastic Four: First Steps), and Pigtail Petrova (voiced by Maria Bakalova-Borat Subsequent MoviefilmBodies Bodies BodiesThe Apprentice). 

            The film also features the voices of Zazie Beetz (AtlantaDeadpool 2Joker) reprising her role as Governor Diane Foxington/The Crimson Paw, Alex Borstein (Family GuyThe Lizzie McGuire MovieThe Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) reprising her role as Commissioner Misty Luggins, and Richard Ayoade (SubmarineSoulThe Phoenician Scheme) reprising his role as Professor Marmalade. 

            Overall, The Bad Guys 2 offers another funny, visually dazzling, and gripping second caper with Wolf and the gang that goes big and absurd while still retaining that sly mischief we all come to expect from these reformed “Bad Guys”. Compared to other family-oriented (theatrical) releases this summer, this is easily the best movie out now for parents to take their kids to because it entertains on both levels with fast-paced action and silly gags for the kids and witty dialogue and homages to beloved heist and crime movies for adults. 

            The movie does prioritize its action and humor over the story which isn’t exactly a strike against it as it excels at both with one of my favorite moments being a sequence where the Bad Guys are stuck to a super magnet and has to stop a computer from uploading a precious file to the public which is as creative as it is funny. But I felt the first film had a more focused narrative with the Bad Guys trying to turn over a new leaf and become “Good” which made their redemption more impactful. 

This one is just a really funny and action-packed heist-comedy about the Bad Guys trying to prove that they’re still good after being put in a position where they’re seen as bad again. Again, it doesn’t mean this is a bad film as I was laughing hard and invested in what was going on, I personally just favor the plot of the first movie more. 

            Like the first, the animation is still excellent and captures that stylized graphic novel look of the source material and yes, that Spider-Verse influence shines through again. Characters react in different animation styles, flashy effects during action scenes, and cartoony slapstick, this along with the first film’s animation makes me want to check out the original books sometime, they seem very artistically pleasing if they’re anything like the movies that spawned from them. 

            The Bad Guys 2 is one of DreamWorks’ better animated features and a solid follow-up to a very entertaining film. Compared to ElioSmurfs, and the live-action versions of Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon, Wolf and his crew easily stole their thunder and they won’t be giving it back anytime soon. 

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Happy Gilmore 2 review

HAPPY GILMORE 2: 

ADAM SANDLER RETURNS TO THE COURSE IN MODERATELY FUNNY SEQUEL! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: ** ½ out of 4


NETFLIX

Adam Sandler in Happy Gilmore 2

 

            Adam Sandler (50 First DatesYou Don’t Mess with the ZohanUncut Gems) is back on the golf course in Happy Gilmore 2, the much anticipated sequel to his 1996 comedy smash hit, Happy Gilmore. I won’t be the first to say that Sandler’s style of humor is pretty hit-or-miss especially in recent years, but the original Happy Gilmore is often considered one of his best comedies and a staple in the sports-comedy genre. 

            It wasn’t trying to be a game-changing comedy or anything like that, it’s just a dumb, funny movie that delivers on laughs while also balancing it out with a fair amount of heart. Like I said, Sandler is a mixed bag, but films like this, Anger Management50 First Dates, and The Wedding Singer best showcase his comedic talents. 

            After 2015’s Pixels which was a huge disaster, I started to distance myself from Adam Sandler movies with a couple of exceptions like Hotel Transylvania and Uncut Gems, but since Happy Gilmore is a film of his I speak fondly of, I decided to give the new sequel on Netflix a shot. Happy Gilmore 2 reunites Sandler with his onscreen nemesis, Christopher McDonald (Flubber, The Iron GiantHacks) this time with Kyle Newacheck (WorkaholicsMurder MysteryWhat We Do in the Shadows) behind the camera. 

            So, does this comedy sequel bring Adam Sandler back to his glory days? Not exactly, but I laughed a fair amount of times during my viewing. 

            I didn’t really have any expectations with this movie and while I can’t say it works entirely and often relies heavily on nostalgia for the first movie, I found the movie funny enough and it was neat seeing Sandler and McDonald again as their iconic characters. 

            The film is set eleven years after the first and follows hockey player turned golfer, Happy Gilmore (Sandler) who was once at the top of his game, but a stroke of bad luck plunges him back down to rock bottom. His wife, Virginia (Julie Bowen-ERMultiplicityHorrible Bosses; reprising her role from the first) was accidentally killed by a golf ball to the head (Yeah, they did the Zoolander 2 thing here!) and now he’s trying to pay for his daughter’s overseas ballet school so now Happy Gilmore has to get back on top by making his return to professional golf. 

            However, the game has changed drastically with a new form of golf known as Maxi Golf making its ways thus forcing Happy to make an unexpected alliance with his arch nemesis and shit-for-breakfast eater, Shooter McGavin (McDonald) in order to save traditional golf and get the money for his daughter’s ballet school. 

            The film also stars Benny Safdie (Licorice PizzaAre You There God? It’s Me, MargaretOppenheimer) who also co-directed Sandler in Uncut Gems as Frank Manatee, Bad Bunny (F9Bullet TrainCaught Stealing) as Oscar Mejias, Ben Stiller (Zoolander 1 and 2Starsky & HutchTropic Thunder) reprising his role as Hal L., Haley Joel Osment (The Sixth SenseA.I. Artificial IntelligenceBlink Twice) as Billy Jenkins, Lavell Crawford (Breaking BadBetter Call SaulThe Ridiculous 6) as Slim Peterson, and Eminem (8 MileFunny People) as Donald Floyd Jr. 

            Overall, Happy Gilmore 2 is a sequel that gives exactly what it promises and doesn’t try to be anything more which might be enough for fans of the original film or Adam Sandler fans in general. I can’t say I found this film knee-slapping hilarious especially compared to the first, but there were some gags and jokes that made me laugh with probably my favorite being this fight between Sandler and Christopher McDonald when they meet again in a cemetery that shows all the characters and actors from the original that passed away including Carl Weathers AKA Chubbs Peterson which was both very funny and somehow touching at the same time. 

            Christopher McDonald in general is still hilarious as Shooter McGavin who I found to be the most consistently funny character in the film who suffered a mental breakdown after the last movie so McDonald gets to unleash his crazy side and I found myself smiling and laughing every time he was onscreen. Ben Stiller also reverts back to his Heavyweights and Dodgeball days as Sandler’s abusive leader of his alcoholic support group and like McDonald, delivers some great laughs in his amount of screen time. 

            The movie leans into absurdity a lot of the time with a more exaggerated version of golf compared to the first that reminded me of the Space Jam: A New Legacy version of basketball minus the video game part. Sometimes I was just entertained by how crazy this game of golf against these almost-bionic golfers got. 

            However, the film does fall into those Happy Madison traps that sometime work, but most of the time REALLY don’t. Grown men showing off their rear ends, fart jokes, toilet jokes, Rob Schneider looking for a paycheck, that kind of shit though I guess they were a little more restrained here compared to other Adam Sandler/Happy Madison projects and there were some genuine laughs in this movie. 

            The plot is pretty unoriginal and we’ve heard this kind of set-up dozens of times before (maybe even more). The superstar was once on the top of the world, then he sinks down to rock bottom, and now he needs to get his groove back and rise back to the top, Happy Gilmore 2 doesn’t add anything new to this and gives the exact formula you’d expect out of this premise. 

            I will give this film a lot of credit for bringing back the heart from Sandler’s earlier work as while I didn’t find everything in the movie funny, I was invested in Sandler returning to golf to pay for his daughter’s ballet school. Despite turning to alcoholism after his wife died and facing financial problems, Sandler’s Happy is trying his damnedest to be a good father for his children at various points of the film and there was a strong family dynamic to anchor it. 

            Happy Gilmore 2 is a downgrade from the original 1996 comedy classic and relies on a lot of nostalgia for the first movie (Even right down to recycling footage from it all the damn time), but fans of the original and Adam Sandler will likely find something to enjoy here. Personally, I’ll stick with the first Happy Gilmore but given that this was on Netflix for free and I did laugh a number of times during it, I didn’t feel like my time was wasted. 

The Fantastic Four: First Steps review

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS: 

MARVEL’S SUPER-FAMILY’S MCU DEBUT TRULY IS “FANTASTIC”! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: **** out of 4


MARVEL STUDIOS

Ben Grimm/The Thing, Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic, Sue Storm/Invisible Woman, and Johnny Storm/Human Torch in The Fantastic Four: First Steps

 

            Marvel’s Super-Family returns to the big screen in The Fantastic Four: First Steps, the latest installment of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and second reboot of the Fantastic Four film series (Third if you count the 2005 film as a reboot). The Fantastic Four has had a…pretty bumpy history when it comes to bringing these classic comic characters into the world of film to put it lightly. 

            There was the 1994 Roger Corman Fantastic Four movie that was screened once and never officially released to the public, but bootlegs and YouTube helped make it a fascinating piece of comic book movie history. Obviously, you had the 2005 Fantastic Four movie and its 2007 sequel, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer produced by 20th Century Fox following the success of the X-Men and Spider-Man films that will always have a special place in my heart even if they aren’t exactly good. 

            The 2015 Fantastic Four reboot from Fox is straight-up garbage and one of the worst comic book and superhero films I ever saw as it wasted a talented cast and equally talented director and turned some of Marvel’s most upbeat superheroes into a dull slog of a trainwreck. I even reviewed that movie nearly ten years ago, how time flies. 

            But then, something happened, a variant of Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic played by John Krasinski and Chris Evans reprising his role from the 2005-2007 movies as Johnny Storm/The Human Torch suddenly appeared in the MCU films, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and Deadpool & Wolverine and got people excited for Disney and Marvel to finally do this Super-Family properly. That’s where The Fantastic Four: First Steps comes in directed by Matt Shakman (It’s Always Sunny in PhiladelphiaFargoGame of Thrones) who had previously directed the MCU miniseries, WandaVision for Disney+.

            I was excited for this when I saw the trailers and could tell it was going to be a very different version of the Fantastic Four compared to previous films with a 1960s-inspired world, a comic accurate version of Galactus, and tons of campy visuals reminiscent of media from the era and the comics that inspired it. 

            Well, I’m happy to report that after two decades of mediocre or straight-up awful film adaptations of one of Marvel’s most iconic teams, this new version of Fantastic Four truly lives up to the name. People, superhero movies are back! Between this and the new Superman that came out a couple weeks ago, we’re starting to regain that excitement for superhero and comic book-based cinema again. 

            The film is set in a universe parallel to the Avengers and follows astronauts turned superheroes, Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic (Pedro Pascal-The MandalorianThe Unbearable Weight of Massive TalentMaterialists), Sue Storm/The Invisible Woman (Vanessa Kirby-Mission: Impossible franchise, Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & ShawNapoleon), Ben Grimm/The Thing (Ebon Moss-Bachrach-The BearThe PunisherAndor), and Johnny Storm/The Human Torch (Joseph Quinn-Stranger ThingsGladiator IIWarfare) who after being exposed to a cosmic storm of radiation are given extraordinary abilities thus becoming the Fantastic Four. But when Sue becomes pregnant with her and Reed’s child and intergalactic threats come in the form of the planet-eating, Galactus (Ralph Ineson-The Green KnightNosferatuFrankenstein (2025)) and his messenger, the Silver Surfer (Julia Garner-The Perks of Being a WallflowerSin City: A Dame to Kill ForWeapons), this Super-Family must fight the giant space god and defend their planet before things get personal which…they do. 

            The film also stars Sarah Niles (Ted LassoThe Toxic Avenger (2023), F1: The Movie) as Lynne Nichols, Matt Gatiss (SherlockThe FavouriteMission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning/The Final Reckoning) as Ted Gilbert, Natasha Lyonne (Blade: TrinityDC League of Super-PetsThe Bad Guys 2) as Rachel Rozman, and Paul Walter Hauser (Richard JewellBlack BirdCobra Kai) as Harvey Elder/Mole Man. 

            Overall, The Fantastic Four: First Steps finally gives Marvel’s Super-Family the movie they deserved since at least 2005 by giving audiences a fun superhero adventure that blends flashy action, strong family dilemmas, and heart and isn’t afraid to be a comic book movie. Not putting the Marvel Studios intro in front of Captain America: Brave New World doesn’t automatically make it dark and gritty and listing a bunch of A24 movies in the trailer for Thunderbolts* doesn’t mean it’s a superhero version of an independent film, The Fantastic Four: First Steps embraces the retro comic book tone and gives exactly what it promises in the best way. 

            This movie looks amazing in terms of the cinematography and production design which makes it feel like a superhero movie if it took place in a futuristic world where Steven Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can was like the second coming of Jesus. With tons of vibrant colors, technology reminiscent of 1960s tech that still feels high-tech, and campy visuals and retro scene transitions like media from that decade, it’s like “A Comic Book Movie” he-DOY? 

            Given that this is Fantastic Four we’re talking about, the family dynamic is very strong in this movie with a lot of the fun coming from seeing and hearing the different four members interact with one another. These actors and characters are incredibly funny and charming while also being endearing and interesting especially Vanessa Kirby’s Sue Storm who is basically the emotional anchor of the film, a mother doing everything she can to protect her child and saying she’s the best live-action Invisible Woman would be a huge understatement. 

            The action is very creative and fun to watch especially on IMAX with my favorite being a fight with the Silver Surfer in a wormhole that could put Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar to shame. Also, the climactic fight against Galactus is great because it’s essentially four superheroes going up against a Godzilla-sized super-being, huge props for not causing the conflicts yourself, F4! 

            As someone who does have a soft spot for the Fox Fantastic Four movies from 2005 and 2007, The Fantastic Four: First Steps really is the only Fantastic Four movie that matters as it finally gives a film that’s worthy of Marvel’s Super-Family and reminds us why we fell in love with them to begin with. I’m sure it’ll make die-hard Marvel fans happy and moviegoers will have a “Fantastic” time at the theater as well; comic book and superhero movies are back! 

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Eddington review

EDDINGTON: 

ASTER AND PHOENIX’S LATEST COLLAB DIDN’T BREAK ME THIS TIME, BUT…! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: ** out of 4


A24

Joaquin Phoenix, Pedro Pascal, Emma Stone, and Austin Butler in Eddington

 

            Joaquin Phoenix (Walk the LineHerJoker 1 and 2) and director Ari Aster (HereditaryMidsommarBeau is Afraid) reunite after 2023’s Beau is Afraid in the neo-Western black comedy, Eddington. Regardless of the film’s quality, I think Joaquin Phoenix is a very fascinating actor for better and worse as he’s almost always unhinged and gives a million percent onscreen, even in a film as bad as Joker: Folie à Deux, Phoenix wasn’t phoning his performance in and I both respect that and am terrified at the same time. 

            On top of that, Ari Aster is a fascinating director himself with Hereditary and Midsommar being some of my favorite films of 2018 and 2019 and his first collab with Phoenix, Beau is Afraid was such an ambitious and bizarre oddity, it broke me when I reviewed it. Needless to say, I was certainly interested in their next project, Eddington when it was making its rounds at film festivals and garnering very polarizing reactions. 

            After seeing it for myself recently…yeah, those mixed reactions were completely warranted because holy fuck! Eddington is a chaotic, often puzzling movie that leans into satire of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 and social commentary with no real understanding of what it’s trying to say so it just comes off as confused and rather dull at times. 

            The film is set in Eddington, New Mexico during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and chronicles a standoff between Sheriff Joe Cross (Phoenix) and Mayor Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal-The MandalorianMaterialistsThe Fantastic Four: First Steps) which sparks a powder keg as neighbor is pitted against neighbor in the contested mayoral election and examines the political and social turmoil caused by it. Oh, and there’s a drunk homeless man screaming shit throughout the movie…kinda hits too close to home given the city I live in. 

            The film also stars Emma Stone (Zombieland 1 and 2La La LandPoor Things) as Joe’s wife Louise Cross, Austin Butler (Once Upon a Time in HollywoodElvisCaught Stealing) as radical cult leader Vernon Jefferson Peak, Luke Grimes (American SniperFifty Shades trilogy, Yellowstone) as Guy, Deirdre O’Connell (City of AngelsEternal Sunshine of the Spotless MindThe Requin) as Dawn, Michael Ward (The Old GuardEmpire of LightThe Book of Clarence) as Michael, and Clifton Collins Jr. (TrafficThe Last CastleCapote) as Lodge. 

            Overall, Eddington certainly has a lot going for it and will likely hit differently with moviegoers. For me, while there are things about it that are undoubtedly impressive like the production design, the performances by Phoenix, Pascal, and Butler, and how Aster shoots his scenes, I just found it too preachy to be fully invested. 

            There are some great scenes in this movie with incredible acting and the film touches on relevant social themes like racism and abuse of power, but they’re so awkwardly handled and when you see the big picture with everything put together, it’s a huge mess. It’s an example of a film that had a lot to say but didn’t know how to convey them in a coherent plot with compelling characters thus making it hard to care in the long run. 

            You have these big scenes with heated arguments, people screaming at each other, guns firing left and right, but all throughout it I was just asking “What is this movie trying to say!?!” I get that this is trying to dive into the impact and emotions of the pandemic, but this is 2025 so the shock value is gone. 

            Compared to the first Joker which was also a pretty divisive film, I understood its themes and social commentary a lot better while being captivated by its dark character journey and getting wrapped up in the plot. It knew how to convey its subject matter better in a feature film where this gets too focused on social themes that it loses any sense of intrigue or emotional investment it once had. 

Despite the lackluster material, Joaquin Phoenix still gives his all though I don’t think he’s really acting here, I think they just followed him around with a camera in 2020 and shot a movie around it. Tell me you wouldn’t be shocked if that was how Joaquin Phoenix acted during the COVID-19 pandemic, oh well, he’s a standout regardless! 

Pedro Pascal isn’t quite as prominent as Joaquin Phoenix, but he gives a solid performance in the amount of screen time he has with the banter between him and Phoenix coming off as both frightening and comedic sometimes simultaneously. Austin Butler and Emma Stone have some amazing moments too, but they’re nowhere near as focused on as Phoenix and Pascal. 

The cinematography is amazing and I love how Aster shoots his outdoor scenes with tons of wide shots; the movie is a mixed bag but at least it looked great on the big screen. Also, like Beau is Afraid, Ari Aster pretty much went for broke with this movie and even though I didn’t really enjoy the film much, I have to respect him for sticking to his vision. 

Eddington is the kind of movie that will certainly be discussed a lot amongst film enthusiasts and honestly, nobody is wrong with their opinions on this film. One may see it as a confused slog with dated pandemic satire and another will admire the ambition and tenacity behind Aster’s vision, I am genuinely curious to know what people think of this movie because it truly is…a movie. 

Smurfs review

SMURFS: 

OOF, THIS ONE MADE ME “BLUE”! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: * ½ out of 4


PARAMOUNT ANIMATION

Smurfette and her friends are back in Smurfs (2025)

 

            Oh boy, here we go again, those cute little blue creatures from Peyo’s comic strip pages and classic cartoon are back on the big screen in this new movie version of Smurfs. If you read my reviews for The Smurfs 2 (2013) and Smurfs: The Lost Village (2017) then you know I don’t have any nostalgic connections with the Smurfs franchise, I don’t hate or even dislike it, it was just never my thing. 

            Needless to say, I wasn’t particularly enthusiastic when Sony Pictures’ Smurfs movie from 2011 was released which took the Smurfs out of their magical mushroom village and threw them into modern day New York City to have shenanigans with Neil Patrick Harris and a ton of product placement, it was bad and so was its sequel though I give Hank Azaria some credit for at least trying to get something out of his performance as the evil wizard, Gargamel. 

            However, Sony’s fully animated Smurfs movie, Smurfs: The Lost Village from 2017 I actually thought wasn’t that bad and felt a lot closer to what a Smurfs movie should be like compared to the previous two films. It isn’t anything spectacular and I wouldn’t seek it out ever again, but compared to the live-action Smurfs movies, The Lost Village was a huge improvement over them. 

            Now we have this new film from director Chris Miller (Shrek the ThirdPuss in Boots) and Paramount Pictures who originally had the feature film rights to The Smurfs until Sony acquired them and we got The Smurfs (2011). Truth be told, their original idea for a Smurfs movie sounded promising with an animated fantasy movie approach reminiscent of The Lord of the Rings and The Princess Bride, but then the rights landed at Sony who instead tried to make their own Alvin and the Chipmunks movie out of it because that was successful. 

            That didn’t seem like the movie we were going to get when the trailers first came out, it just looked like another bad Smurfs movie except it’s from a different studio with focus on the multiverse (Because if it worked for Spider-Man and the Marvel Cinematic Universe then clearly it’ll work for Smurfs). Despite not being won over by the previous Smurfs movies and unimpressed by the marketing, I tried to keep an open mind with this new Smurfs film and…it’s bad, but…! 

            I do think this Smurfs movie is better than the ones from 2011 and 2013 as the film does get creative with the crazy worlds the Smurfs explore, the animation style is appealing, and most of the voice acting is decent. But it still falls flat in terms of the writing, logic, and overreliance on tired kids movie tropes, in other words Paramount is basically copying what Sony did. 

            The film follows Smurfette (voiced by Rihanna-BattleshipValerian and the City of a Thousand Planets,Ocean’s 8) and No Name Smurf (voiced by James Corden-Into the WoodsPeter Rabbit 1 and 2Trolls 1 and 2) leading the Smurfs on an adventure to rescue Papa Smurf (voiced by John Goodman-The Big LebowskiThe Emperor’s New GrooveMonsters, Inc. 1 and 2) after being captured by the evil wizard brothers, Razamel and Gargamel (Both voiced by J.P. Karliak-X-Men ‘97New Looney TunesSkylanders). This leads them outside their mushroom-housed Smurf Village and into the real world where they encounter an International Neighborhood Watch Smurfs group, Papa Smurf’s long lost brother, Ken (voiced by Nick Offerman-The Lego Movie 1 and 2Dumb MoneyMission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning), and a whole dimension of Smurfing insanity on their quest to save Papa Smurf. 

            The film also features the voices of Dan Levy (Schitt’s Creek) as Joel, Amy Sedaris (ElfStrangers with CandyBoJack Horseman) as Jaunty, Nathasha Lyonne (American Pie franchise, The Fantastic Four: First StepsThe Bad Guys 2) as Mama Poot, Sandra Oh (Grey’s AnatomyKilling EveRaya and the Last Dragon) as Moxie Smurf, Alex Winter (The Lost BoysBill and Ted trilogy, In Search of Darkness) as Hefty Smurf, Maya Erskine (Mr. & Mrs. SmithScoob!Wildwood) as Vanity Smurf, Xolo Maridueña (ParenthoodCobra KaiBlue Beetle) as Brainy Smurf, Miller as Grouchy Smurf, and Billie Lourd (American Horror StoryStar Wars franchise, The Last Showgirl) as Worry Smurf. 

            Overall, Smurfs (2025) is to put it simply, another dumb Smurfs movie that I can only recommend to very young kids and even then, that’s a stretch when there are other family films out in theaters or on streaming that are much better. I can’t say this film made me angry while watching it as it gave me what it advertised and mostly found myself bored by it aside from when the film decides to get crazy. 

            I’m going to say a few nice things about it; I like the animation style of this movie and does capture the look and feel of the cartoon except brought in a 3D world, they even do some cute visual gags with comic word bubbles. It honestly made me wish I was just watching a Smurfs movie set in Smurf Village with this colorful animation without the real world. 

            The voice acting is decent and I don’t mean Rihanna and James Corden, John Goodman was a fine choice for Papa Smurf as he naturally has that gruff, dad-like voice and plays it well here. JP Karliak is entertaining as both Razamel and Gargamel despite the material not really doing him any favors, he can at least deliver it in a humorous way and is giving his all. 

            This film plays around with the multiverse a lot which shows the Smurfs entering different universes with various animation styles like stop-motion, 8-bit video game, and anime. That was when I was starting to admire the film’s energy, but it was in the climax and I wanted more of that instead of this uninspired kids film nonsense. 

            Aside from those things, this movie did absolutely nothing for me and just hits those beats I was expecting from a film like this, dumb jokes with Smurfs in place of words, modern talk, and I do not need to say what this film ends with because you already know. I wouldn’t mind some of these rehashed things if the movie was clever or compelling and it isn’t either. 

            This movie manages to somehow have less of a reason to go to the real world than the Neil Patrick Harris Smurfs movies, the characters barely interact with the live-action environments and to make it even more confusing, the logic of animated characters living in the real world for no reason. Yeah, Razamel and Gargamel’s castle is in the real world and inside there are a bunch of cartoon characters and animated interiors, was it trying to be like Who Framed Roger Rabbit where toons and humans co-exist or were the writers on Blue Meth again? I’m guessing the latter! 

            Yeah, Smurf this Smurfing movie and go see any other movie! Smurfs (2025) has energy and appealing aspects, but at the cost of entertainment value and cleverness as another grim example of adapting a classic cartoon to feature film. 

I Know What You Did Last Summer review

I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER: 

LEGACY SEQUEL TO A HORROR MOVIE THAT DOESN’T HAVE MUCH OF A LEGACY! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: ** out of 4


COLUMBIA PICTURES

The Fisherman has returned in I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025)

 

The notorious Fisherman Killer has resurfaced to stalk another group of people in I Know What You Did Last Summer, the legacy sequel to the 1997 slasher film of the same name. The film is directed and co-written by Jennifer Kaytin Robinson (Sweet/ViciousThor: Love and ThunderDo Revenge) and once again produced by Neal H. Moritz (Fast & Furious franchise, XXX 1 and 2Sonic the Hedgehog trilogy). 

The original I Know What You Did Last Summer is a very formulaic horror movie that was obviously made to capitalize on the success of Wes Craven’s Scream which was released a year prior (Even right down to it being from the same writer), but the performances by the leads are strong enough and there’s a fair amount of creative kills. The 1998 sequel, I Still Know What You Did Last Summer and the 2006 direct-to-DVD standalone third installment, I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer are hot garbage with the latter being one of the worst films I’ve ever seen and I’ve never seen the 2021 miniseries on Amazon Prime Video

            Well, after the success of the Halloween and Scream legacy sequels, of course, I Know What You Did Last Summer has to get in on the action where new protagonists team up with the old characters to stop the current killer (I should be expecting an Urban Legend legacy sequel in the near future). It makes sense, the original I Know What You Did Last Summer was made to cash-in on the popularity of the first Scream and now this movie is cashing in on the success of Scream’s 2022 legacy sequel…the catch is this one is not as good as the 2022 Scream or its follow-up. 

            I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025) is technically the best installment since the original (Though that isn’t saying much given how terrible the other films are), but it’s a very by the numbers legacy sequel that’s clearly trying to ride the coattails of Halloween and Scream with tons of nostalgic callbacks and returning cast members, but nothing to make it stand out. 

            The film follows five friends consisting of Danica Richards (Madelyn Cline-Boy ErasedOuter BanksGlass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery), Ava Brucks (Chase Sui Wonders-GenerationBodies Bodies BodiesThe Studio), Milo Griffin (Jonah Hauer-King-World on FireThe Little Mermaid (2023), Doctor Who), Teddy Spencer (Tyriq Withers-LegaciesThe GameRich Wigga, Poor Wigga), and Stevie Ward (Sarah Pidgeon-The WildsTiny Beautiful ThingsThe Friend) getting together for an engagement party on the 4th of July. Things take a terrifying turn when they inadvertently cause a deadly car accident and the group makes a pact never to speak of it. 

            One year later in Southport, they start receiving mysterious messages that read “I Know What You Did Last Summer” and an unknown hook-wielding killer starts axing them off forcing them to confront the survivors of a similar massacre in 1997, Julie James (Jennifer Love Hewitt-Party of FiveCan’t Hardly WaitHeartbreakers) and Ray Bronson (Freddie Prinze Jr.-Head over HeelsScooby-Doo 1 and 2Star Wars: Rebels) in hopes of getting their help in stopping this new Fisherman killer. 

            The film also stars Billy Campbell (The RocketeerBram Stoker’s DraculaThe Killing) as Grant Spencer, Gabbriette (Idiotka) as Tyler Trevino, Austin Nichols (One Tree HillThe Day After TomorrowThe Walking Dead) as Pastor Judah, Joshua Orpin (TitansHome and Away) as Wyatt, and Isaiah Mustafa (ShadowhuntersIt: Chapter TwoBoy Kills World) as Andrew. 

            Overall, I Know What You Did Last Summer is a very standard legacy sequel to a horror movie that doesn’t really have much of a legacy to begin with. It’s clearly trying to be like the recent Halloween and Scream movies with all the nods and references to the earlier films, but it just hits every tired trope from these kinds of movies without doing anything that unique or surprising (Aside from one twist in the last third that was completely fucking bonkers!). 

            But I am willing to excuse this film’s lack of originality if the lead characters are compelling and sadly, aside from maybe Madelyne Cline’s Danica and Chase Sui Wonders’ Ava (The two main female protagonists), I didn’t care for this new group of protagonists. They mostly just ranged from obnoxious douchebags to stock characters that are just there to die. 

            I’m not saying the characters in the original film were super deep or complex, but at least they were memorable and I gave…enough of a shit about them especially Jennifer Love Hewitt’s character. Sure, she’s no Jamie Lee Curtis’ Laurie Strode from Halloween or Neve Campbell’s Sidney Prescott from Scream, but I was invested in Hewitt’s Julie James and wanted to see her escape the Fisherman in the previous movies and it was nice to see her again in this though she’s not as prominent as Curtis and Campbell were in the recent Halloween and Scream films. 

            There are some fun and inventive slasher movie kills in this like the one involving the outdoor pool lights shown in the trailers and the Fisherman staging scenes with the corpses of his/her victims for someone to react horrifyingly to. Plenty of gory hook deaths and speargun shooting with blood on the floor that I actually wouldn’t mind watching again…as clips on YouTube after the film leaves theaters. 

            I Know What You Did Last Summer tries to revitalize a dead iconic horror franchise with a legacy sequel to follow in the footsteps of Halloween and Scream, but it really misses the mark and becomes a generic and ultimately forgettable slasher movie revival. It just goes to show, some legacies don’t need to live on especially those that didn’t really have one from the start. 
            Also, someone should tell Disney executives that “Nostalgia is overrated!”. 

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Superman review

SUPERMAN: 

LOOK UP IN THE SKY, IT’S A DAMN GOOD SUPERMAN FILM! 

By Nico Beland

Movie Review: *** ½ out of 4


DC STUDIOS (WARNER BROS. PICTURES)

David Corenswet in Superman (2025)

 

            James Gunn (SuperGuardians of the Galaxy trilogy, The Suicide Squad (2021)) kicks off DC Cinematic Universe Attempt #2 with this new film version of Superman, based on the DC Comics superhero of the same name. The Man of Steel has had quite a history in terms of film adaptations ever since his inception whether it’s through film serials, the first two Christopher Reeve movies from 1978 and 1980 which are often seen as classics and hailed as some of the greatest comic book films ever made, and the bumpy first attempt at a DC Universe with the DCEU

            Now James Gunn has left the Marvel Cinematic Universe after completing Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 3 to give DC the shared universe it so rightfully deserves…hopefully. It’s hard to determine how great a cinematic universe will be just off of its first entry, but as a movie goes, I thoroughly enjoyed this Superman

            While I can’t say this film reaches the height of Superman: The Movie (1978) or its sequel, it understands the character a lot better than Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel and his subsequent films in the DC Extended Universe and gives audiences an upbeat, entertaining, but not lazily assembled summer escape movie. In an age where comic book movies feel the need to be dark and challenge its audience, sometimes simple lighthearted “Super” fun with compelling characters and enough emotional levity is all you need. 

            The film follows Kal-El/Clark Kent/Superman (David Corenswet-House of CardsPearlTwisters), an alien with extraordinary powers who was sent as a baby to Earth after his home planet, Krypton was destroyed and now protects the planet under the alias, Superman. When billionaire, Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult-X-Men franchise, Mad Max: Fury RoadJuror #2) conducts an evil plan to turn the public against him, Superman must prove that he is the world’s protector with the help of Daily Planet reporter, Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan-The Marvelous Mrs. MaiselThe CourierThe Amateur) and a few Justice League (Oh sorry, Justice Gang, huge difference!) members…oh, and Krypto the Superdog too!

            The film also stars Edi Gathegi (Gone Baby GoneTwilight 1 and 2X-Men: First Class) as Michael/Holt/Mister Terrific, Anthony Carrigan (The ForgottenGothamDeath of a Unicorn) as Rex Mason/Metamorpho, Nathan Fillion (FireflyCastleDC Animated Universe) as Guy Gardner/Green Lantern, Isabela Merced (Transformers: The Last KnightDora and the Lost City of GoldAlien: Romulus) as Kendra Saunders/Hawkgirl, and Skyler Gisondo (The Amazing Spider-Man 1 and 2BooksmartLicorice Pizza) as Jimmy Olsen. 

            Overall, Superman (2025) takes the Man of Steel back to his upbeat comic book roots with a bright and colorful superhero flick with solid action scenes, great performances by the leads, and it doesn’t shy away from heavier or dark moments either. I doubt it will become a classic like the first two Christopher Reeve Superman movies, but as a start to a new cinematic universe, I found this movie very entertaining and it got me interested in the future of this DC Universe

            The film takes the Spider-Man: HomecomingBatman (1989), and The Batman (2022) route and has the character already established without going beat for beat into the backstory because let’s be real, everyone already knows Superman’s origin story just as much as they know Batman and Spider-Man’s. But the core elements are still there and his past is brought up at various points in the film so nothing is really lost here. 

            James Gunn and the rest of the crew knew this so they decided to focus this movie on Superman trying to prove his worth to the planet as its protector by facing off against Lex Luthor and saving lives along the way and I think it’s done very well. Seeing Superman interact with the citizens of Metropolis whether as the Man of Steel or Clark Kent is an integral part of the character that gives him his humanity which is something I felt the Zack Snyder Superman was severely lacking despite Henry Cavill clearly trying to make the films work. 

            This Superman saves a squirrel from Lex Luthor’s destruction and let me tell you, if Henry Cavill did something like that while fighting General Zod in Man of Steel, it easily would have been a far better movie. The movie understands Superman and him being a symbol for hope and empowerment and a lot of that does come down to David Corenswet’s performance as the Man of Steel. 

            I’ve only seen him in a handful of things, but I thought David Corenswet was perfect in the role of Superman and I love too that while this is a more uplifting and positive portrayal, he isn’t trying to replicate Christopher Reeve from the original four movies or Brandon Routh from Superman Returns. I’m sure Corenswet was probably inspired by those performances in some shape or form, but he is clearly giving his own take on Superman and portraying him as a man who wants to do good and inspire those around him while still understanding the seriousness of the situations he’s in.

            However, I will say this movie makes the strange but interesting decision of downplaying David Corenswet as Clark Kent which is usually just as important as when he’s Superman. Aside from a scene in the beginning, there is barely any Clark Kent in this movie and I don’t know how I feel about that. 

            Rachel Brosnahan played a good Lois Lane and I enjoyed her chemistry with David Corenswet’s Superman as sort of an on-again, off-again relationship, but in a charming way. They don’t make her the damsel in distress like in other Superman media and she even helps him out during the action at times such as flying a spaceship. 

            Nicholas Hoult is probably one of the last actors I’d expect to play Lex Luthor, but he effectively captured the charismatic and threatening businessman from the comics and is easily my second favorite movie Lex Luthor behind Gene Hackman from the original films. Now I’m convinced, if he had better material and direction maybe Jesse Eisenberg could have played a decent Lex had things been different. 

            The action is very exciting though it is reliant on a lot of CGI that doesn’t always look convincing, but they do cool things with it especially with characters like Green Lantern and Mister Terrific. It isn’t just flashy superhero fights between giant monsters and other super people, sometimes it’s just Superman rescuing an alien baby from a collapsing pocket dimension or a gleefully silly sequence involving Krypto that puts Hulk and Loki from Avengers to shame. 

            Despite a few hurdles, Superman (2025) is the upbeat, fun, and positive superhero movie we need especially with so much negativity in the world lately. If you’re looking to escape all that then go to your local theater and see this feel-good summer blockbuster.